"Natural" landscapes as a Cure to Modern Life (Spencer Mottley)
One day while siting at my desk, occupied by the constant stream of new assignments and
upcomeing test I have to study for. I start to slowly drift away from the task at hand and day dream to
myself how different my life is from my ancestors who lived only a couple generations prior to my own.
In some ways these lifestyle changes are postive includeing an increased standard of liveing, increased
access to information and increased convenience. In other ways these differences are hugely
determinatal to our physical, emotional and even cogentive health. Some of these negative difference in
our lifestyles include increased sedentariness, decreased soical interaction and increased stress. In many
ways the built landscapes many of us surround ourselves in on a daily basis contrubute to these negative
differences in lifestyle for instance the constant sound of construction, cars honking or airplanes flying
overhead often contrubute to feelings of stress. Simairly a lack of sidewalks and bikelanes in our subaran
neighorhoods and cites increases our dependence on cars as mode of transportation which leads to us
liveing more sedentary lives. Additionally a lack of third spaces in our communities like cafes, parks and
community centers leads to many americans going about their days with little to no soical interaction with
others. Over time these unnatural conditions in which we live, have many adverse effects on our minds
and bodies because they differ so much from the conditions we evolved to live in over the course of
thousands of years. While it's next to impossible for most pepole in the developed world to live like they
would of thousands or even hundreds of years ago. I belive if we strived to incoprtate more "natural"
landscapes into our cities like wooded parks, food forest and commitey gardens. Alot of the negative
effects of moderen life could be greatly minagated. In fact one of the disigners of centeral park
(unagreeably the most famous urban green space in the U.S, and most likely the world) Frederick
Olemstead disigned the ramble is Central Park with a heavy empthises on health. He wanted the ramble to
serve as an escape from the rat-race of New York City by useing "art to conceal art" which means
utilizeing elements normally found in natural landscapes to mask man made structures. In conclusion,
after thinking about this topic I was left with a few questions, to what extent can we redesign cities and
subarubs that are already built? And secondly can you even call so called "natural" landscapes in cities
and suburbs natural? My response to the first question is while there are limitations to just how much we
can redisign our built enviroments I belive we can make significant improvements if we utilize urban land
that is ether abandoned or underutizled. (For example, demolishing an abandoned building and useing the
plot to build a comuntiy garden). My response to the second question is while these urban and suburban
green spaces are not by any means entirely natural, they are often more natural than the areas that often
surround them which gives these places the illusion of being "natural" landscapes. Thus serveing simalir
health benifits as more remote natural landscapes do.
Comments
Post a Comment