Oregon River Restoration (Spencer Mottley)

 

    An intreging article came to my attention as I was scrolling on New York Times, that relates to our 

 class discussion on rivers. The article was titled "A River Restoration in Oregon Gets Fast Results:

The Salmon Swam Right Back" by Rebecca Dzombak. This article dissucses how salmon have returened

to their historic breeding grounds in the upper Klamath River after a series of dams were removed 

that have blocked the salmon from reaching this part of the river for more than one hundred 

years. Largely at the demands of native american tribes, anglers and conservation groups. 

 Dispite these dams being in place for so long the article stated that salmon returned to 

this area as soon as a few days after the final dam was taken down. 


    After completeing this reading I was left with a few questions with the first being, "Do those that use a 

resource (like salmon) have an obligation to protect and look out for that resource?" and secondly "Do the 

ecological, cultural and economic benifts that come with dam removals outweigh the loss of a clean, 

low carbon energy source?" My response to the first question is yes, I belive if you take from nature you 

have a responsibility to give back to it to the best of your ability, and look out for it, one for it's sake 

(Ultamite value) but also so future generations have the privilage of enjoying natures bounty and the 

outdoors in general, like many anglers and native americans do in the present day (Instrmental value). 

My response to the second question is also yes because there are better ways to attain clean energy that

don't degrade entire ecosystems (like solar, or wind energy) and destory entire fisheries that often have

vital importance to local economies and cultures. Some additional thoughts I have regarding this reading

include the importance of the salmon spawn in many cold water rivers, these spawning events not only

boost the salmon population but also provide an important food source to many animals that often live

alongside these rivers like egales, bears, wolves and otters. Another thought I had after reading this article

is the other ecological benefits that come with dam removal other than revived fish stocks, these other

benifits include an increase in sediement deposition at the mouths of rivers (which helps fight erosion and

to a degree can mingate the effects of sea level rise), and an increase in preodic floods (which allows

nuternt rich sediment to pentrate the floodplains that surround rivers). Moreover behind ecology I think it

is also worth noteing that restoreing these rivers also provides a sort of restoration or revival of the

identities of indigenous peoples and to a lesser extent also that of other types of fishermen (recreational,

commercial) who rely on healthy fish stocks to carry on tarditions surrounding the activity of fishing.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Kip Redick Example of a Student's Choosing

Kip Redick Student's Free Choice Example

Kip Redick Example of an Outside Reading Post